ATS résumé score, in 10 seconds.
Engineering recruiters scan résumés in 6 seconds. Their ATS scans them in milliseconds. We grade four dimensions an ATS actually weighs — parseability, keyword density, quantified impact, and action-verb strength — and tell you what to fix.
What we score, and why
- ATS parseability (0–25)
- Did our parser actually extract your text? Is your contact info readable? Image-only PDFs, exotic fonts, and tables routinely tank this score before a recruiter ever sees the file.
- Keyword density (0–25)
- Most ATSes weight keyword overlap heavily. We check against ~250 commonly-required engineering technologies (languages, frameworks, cloud, data, observability) and surface what's missing.
- Quantified impact (0–25)
- “Built X to handle 50k req/s” beats “Worked on scalability” every time. We count the % of bullets that include a measurable number.
- Strong action verbs (0–25)
- Bullets that open with verbs like Shipped, Reduced, Architected outperform “Worked on”, “Helped with”, “Was responsible for”. We measure the ratio.
Privacy: the file is read in memory, scored, and discarded. We do not write it to storage, attach it to an account, or send it to any third party. The only telemetry we collect is the anonymized numeric score (used to chart score distribution, not tied to you).